spacer
Web Development Blog
 Developer Newsletter

Webmaster Blogs
Content & Blogging
Design
Photoshop
General
JavaScript
PHP
PHP Functions
Web
WordPress
Website Promotion

Blog Archives


Developer Tutorials
AJAX
ASP
CGI & Perl
CSS
Flash
HTML
Illustrator
Java
JavaScript
Linux
MySQL
PHP
Photoshop
Python
Wireless
XML
Miscellaneous

Scripts Directory
AJAX Scripts
ASP Scripts
ASP.NET Scripts
CGI & Perl Scripts
Flash Scripts
Java Scripts
JavaScript Scripts
PHP Scripts
Python Scripts
Remotely Hosted Scripts
Tools & Utilities Scripts
XML Scripts

Web Hosting Directory
ASP.NET
Budget
Dedicated Servers
Ecommerce
Linux
Resellers
Shared
Small Business
Windows

Webmaster Blog

PHP Qualifications: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

I’m regularly reviewing candidates for PHP development positions, and I’ve noticed some very interesting trends with regard to the qualifications people list on their resumes. As with anything, here’s the good, the bad, and the downright ugly.

The Good
Despite general opinions from the community that it better reflects your ability to remember textbook concepts than actually code PHP, the Zend Certified Engineer (ZCE) qualification is about as good as it gets, in my mind. If someone takes the trouble to study and attain the ZCE, they’ve got what it takes to, for example, learn the framework we use in our development shop.

I appreciate that it’s no measure of experience, but it’s still a reasonable measure of capability. Having a ZCE is definitely a plus point on a resume.

Of course, I’ve had one candidate give me an executive summary as to why he intentionally didn’t get his ZCE, and we hired him on the spot.

The Bad
The various online tests available, such as from Expert Rating, can occasionally be detrimental to your chances of being hired. I’ve had a candidate once show that he got 99% on an online PHP test, yet he had no other experience to speak of, and when I briefly quizzed him he clearly wasn’t terribly good with actual PHP development.

Given that these tests are open book - as in, there is nothing stopping you from consulting the mighty Google halfway through your test - the results are mildly indicative at best, entirely dubious at worst. There’s nothing wrong with such a qualification - I’ve got one myself - but they’re only really good evidencing your other experience. A solid resume of having worked on various real-world projects, combined with one or two certifications to show that you have the technical skills, is always a good idea.

The Ugly
The worst you can possibly do is have nothing to demonstrate your ability. If anything, bring along some code samples to the interview (or email them through). There’s a reasonable chance you’ll have someone technically-minded helping out with the interview, and if you can demonstrate that you understand the code, you’ll create a decent image.

I’ve had candidates send me incredibly-brief (how does seven words and four URLs sound?) emails listing a couple of sites they’ve worked on, including some hosted on free web hosts. Make sure you demonstrate some basic professionalism and ability to code if you have nothing else to speak of.

Tags: ,


Related Posts
» Web Hosting: Leave it to the Professionals
» GOTO is coming to PHP!
» What makes a perfect backlink
» Email Marketing: The Proper Way
» Google OpenID
 


One Response to “PHP Qualifications: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly”

  1. PHP Usergroup Munich » Blog Archive » The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Says:

    […] via Developertutorials […]

Leave a Reply





About the NetVisits, Inc Network | Write For Us | Advertise
Copyright ©2007 NetVisits, Inc Network. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.
Visit other NetVisits, Inc. sites: